Optimizing Thermal Performance in Short-Time High-Heat-Flux Environments: Dynamic Two-Phase Cooling with Latent Heat Storage

Significance 

As technology in areas like advanced computing and aerospace keeps advancing, the systems powering these innovations are running at higher capacities and creating a lot more heat. Managing that heat is becoming a major challenge. These high-power systems tend to experience short bursts of extreme heat, and older cooling methods just aren’t cutting it anymore. The traditional single-phase heat transfer methods struggle to keep up, which can lead to overheating and ultimately hurt the system’s performance and durability. One of the big issues is how to quickly and efficiently cool things down, especially when the system isn’t running constantly or when cooling options are limited. For instance, in space missions, you can’t always count on having access to traditional cooling methods, so finding ways to store and release heat efficiently becomes really important. Researchers have been looking into two-phase flow systems because they’re better at managing heat, using the energy released when a liquid turns into vapor to help cool things down. But even those systems have their own set of challenges, especially when heat levels are constantly changing. The big limitation is figuring out how to keep everything running smoothly in real time. In response to these problems of efficient cooling in short-time high-heat-flux environments, a recent study published in the International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer took a different approach. Professor Chengbin Zhang and Professor Yongping Chen from Southeast University, along with their colleagues, suggested an innovative setup that combines a pumped two-phase loop (PTL) with latent heat storage (LHS). This setup not only deals with the intense heat but also helps optimize cooling when the system doesn’t have many cooling resources to work with. Latent heat storage is a promising solution, especially for situations where there aren’t many chances to cool things down. By using materials that can absorb and release a lot of energy as they change phases (for example, from solid to liquid), the PTL-LHS system can store excess heat during those intense bursts and release it later when it’s needed. This method has the potential to make systems, particularly in aerospace, last longer and work more reliably by keeping them from overheating at critical times. The researchers were looking for a way to make cooling systems more efficient, especially for high-power setups that generate a lot of heat in short bursts.

In their setup, the authors used methanol as the fluid that would flow through a tiny evaporator channel. The methanol absorbed the heat, turning from liquid to gas. They kept it moving through the system with a pump and added a reservoir to help stabilize the pressure. The heat generated in the test setup was passed on to a special storage unit filled with paraffin wax. They picked paraffin because it can soak up a lot of heat when it melts, which helps prevent sudden overheating. They monitored the temperatures closely at different points—like where the fluid entered and exited the evaporator and the storage unit—so they could see exactly how the system was handling the heat. One of the big things they discovered was that the system had two distinct modes of operation: what they called “fast tracking” and “delay response.” In fast tracking mode, which happened when the system was running with higher flow rates or lower heat loads, the temperature in the storage unit followed the temperature at the evaporator pretty closely. This meant the system was reacting quickly to changes in heat. Most of the heat was absorbed through a basic heat transfer process, and while this allowed for a quick cooling response, it didn’t take full advantage of the heat storage capabilities. When the heat load got heavier or the flow rate slowed down, the system switched to delay response mode. Here, the fluid’s temperature shot up faster in the evaporator, but the paraffin wax took longer to start melting and soaking up the excess heat. This delay meant the system was able to store more heat as the wax absorbed it during its phase change, but the downside was that the cooling response wasn’t as immediate. The temperature in the evaporator climbed more before things started to stabilize, showing that while this mode stored energy better, it wasn’t as quick at cooling down the system when things got too hot.

The researchers also tried something a bit more creative with a variable flow rate strategy. They thought that by starting with a lower flow rate to give the wax time to melt and then gradually increasing the flow, they might find a sweet spot between quick cooling and efficient energy storage. They compared this to using a constant flow rate, and the results were pretty promising. With the variable flow approach, the cooling performance improved a lot, dropping the evaporator wall temperature by about 10°C compared to when they kept the flow constant. Plus, more of the paraffin wax stayed solid by the end of the experiment, suggesting that this strategy allowed for better energy management overall. Another important takeaway was how the system shifted from relying on basic heat transfer to focusing more on the latent heat storage as the heat load increased. When the system faced more extreme heat, the wax became more crucial in managing the temperature. The experiments also highlighted how the flow rate played a big role in determining when the system switched between the fast tracking and delay response modes. Higher flow rates made the system more responsive in fast tracking mode but came at the cost of less efficient energy storage. In the end, these experiments shed some light on how cooling systems for high-power setups could be optimized by playing around with the balance between quick response times and efficient heat storage. It’s all about finding the right flow rates and knowing when to let the system store energy or cool things down in real time.

This new study takes an important step in addressing a growing issue: how to cool high-powered electronics that generate tons of heat, especially in fields like aerospace and directed energy systems. As these devices become more advanced, they also get hotter, and traditional cooling methods often can’t keep up. What’s exciting about this research is that it brings a fresh perspective by combining a pumped two-phase loop with latent heat storage. This system handles intense bursts of heat while making the most out of limited cooling options. The dynamic way it manages heat through phase changes and smart storage could be a game-changer in situations where older cooling methods fall short. We think one of the big impacts of this work is how it could be used in critical fields like aerospace and advanced computing—areas where reliability is key, and overheating simply isn’t an option. The ability to adapt cooling strategies on the fly, depending on how much heat is being produced and how fast the fluid is moving, makes this system a lot more efficient. The research also points out the delicate balance between quickly cooling a system and being able to store and release heat effectively. While fast cooling is sometimes necessary, there’s a lot of value in having a system that can store heat and manage energy more wisely, which is especially useful when cooling resources are limited. The new approach isn’t just useful in high-tech fields—it could have a broader impact in areas like renewable energy, industrial heat recovery, and battery management, where energy efficiency is a major concern. By showing how to maximize energy storage through phase changes, the study opens up new possibilities for making cooling systems more sustainable and energy-efficient across a variety of industries.

Reference

Chengbin Zhang, Yingjuan Zhang, Jiang Sheng, Bo Li, Yongping Chen, Dynamic thermal response behaviors of pumped two-phase loop with latent heat storage, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Volume 225, 2024, 125382,

Go to International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Check Also

Adaptive Path Optimization for Convoy-Support Systems in Repairable Networks Using GPLA