Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Volume 32, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 154-166
Kin Ming Kam, Li Zeng, Qiang Zhou, Richard Tran, Jian Yang
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, 500 West First Street, P.O. Box 19017, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, 500 UTA Blvd., P.O. Box 19138, Arlington, TX 76010, USA
Abstract
There are many situations in quality control of manufacturing processes in which the quality of a process is characterized by the spatial distribution of certain particles in the product, and the more uniform the particle distribution is, the better the quality is. To realize quality control and guide process improvement efforts, the degree of spatial uniformity of particle distributions needs to be assessed. On the other hand, many quantitative metrics have been developed in areas outside manufacturing for measuring uniformity of point patterns, which can be applied for this purpose. However, critical issues exist in applying existing metrics for quality control relating to which metrics to choose and how to use them in specific situations. To provide general guidelines on these issues, this research identifies popular uniformity metrics scattered in different areas and compares their performance in detecting nonuniform particle distributions under various practical scenarios through a comprehensive numerical study. Effects of different factors on the performance of the metrics are revealed and the best metric is found. The use and effectiveness of the selected metric is also demonstrated in a case study where it is applied to data from emerging material fabrication processes in nanomanufacturing and biomanufacturing.
Advances in Engineering Advances in Engineering features breaking research judged by Advances in Engineering advisory team to be of key importance in the Engineering field. Papers are selected from over 10,000 published each week from most peer reviewed journals.