Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?

Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 119, November 2013, Pages 26-34.
Roger Molina, Kerrie Unsworth, Melinda Hodkiewicz, Elisa Adriasola

 

UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

 

 

Abstract

 

Can data collectors be “pushed” into collecting high quality data or would being “pulled” be more effective? This paper finds that managers should be careful of the degree to which “push” factors, such as managerial pressure and technological input control, are relied upon. While they may be helpful for motivating those data collectors who are not intrinsically motivated, they are either not helpful or may discourage those data collectors who are intrinsically motivated. Instead, self-concordance may act as a longer-term, more stable approach to increasing the motivation of data collectors and thus increasing the quality of data that enter reliability systems. This study uses a sequential mixed-method approach involving interviews with 20 data collectors and a quantitative survey of 109 data collectors in a water utility. It examines the interactive effect of managerial pressure, technological input control and self-concordance on data collection performance.

 

Go To Journal

 

Are managerial pressure

 

Check Also

Fiber Break Displacement Maps Stress Redistribution in Notched CMC Laminates

Significance  Reference Xiaoyi Guan, Yana Wang, Jian Jiao, Zhengmao Yang, Hierarchical modeling of strain-concentrating effect …