Advances in Engineering Advances in Engineering features breaking research judged by Advances in Engineering advisory team to be of key importance in the Engineering field. Papers are selected from over 10,000 published each week from most peer reviewed journals.
Surface Science, Volume 608, February 2013, Pages 180-187.
Zs. Rák, R.C. Ewing, U. Becker
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, United States and
Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, United States and
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, United States.
Abstract
The relative stabilities of clean and hydroxylated surfaces of three actinide dioxides (AnO2, An = U, Np, Pu) have been investigated using first-principles methods within the DFT + U framework. In the case of the clean surfaces, the calculated surface energies are consistently the lowest for the (111) surface for all three AnO2compositions, followed by the (110) and (100) surface energies. In the case of UO2, for instance, the calculated surface energies are 0.78, 1.05, and 1.47 J/m2 for the (111), (110), and (100) surfaces, respectively, reinforcing the well-established surface energy trend for metal-dioxides: (111) < (110) < (100). Dissociated water, at one monolayer coverage, is adsorbed preferentially onto the (100) surface for all three AnO2 systems. In the case of UO2 the water adsorption energy on the (100) surface (− 1.34 J/m2) is almost four times higher than the adsorption energy on the (111) surface (− 0.35 J/m2), and almost twice as large as the adsorption energy on the (110) surface (− 0.77 J/m2). Similar trend in the adsorption energies is observed for both NpO2 and PuO2. As a result, the relative stability of the hydroxylated AnO2 (An = U, Np, Pu) surfaces changes to (100) < (110) < (111). The effects of the geometric relaxations on the clean and hydroxylated surfaces are discussed.
